Insights and Resources
Use of trusts for multiple Qualified Small Business Stock exclusions
INSIGHT ARTICLE |
Authored by RSM US LLP
The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act in 2017 decreased both corporate and individual income tax rates. The corporate rate was permanently decreased to 21 percent and the highest individual rates were temporarily (through 2025) decreased to 37 percent. After factoring in the 20 percent qualified business income deduction, this created an effective rate of 29.5 percent for qualified business income which generates an 8.5 percent difference in tax rates between individual and corporate income.
During the 2020 campaign, the Biden administration published a tax plan that would make significant changes to this structure. Included in the plan are provisions that would:
- Increase corporate rates to 28 percent
- Increase the top individual rate and capital gains for high earners to 39.6 percent
- Phase out the qualified business income deduction for high earners
- Increase social security taxes on earned income over $400,000
It is unlikely that any of these provisions will make their way through Congress without some negotiation and compromise. However, if enacted these provisions could change the decision that business owners make with respect to how their business is organized for tax purposes. One key in these decision points may be the taxability of cash and other assets when distributed from a corporation.
For qualified small business stock (QSBS), there is an exclusion of gain limited to the greater of $10 million per taxpayer, reduced by prior eligible gains attributable to the same issuer, or ten times the adjusted basis of stock disposed during the taxable year. In the case of an individual filing a tax return with the status of married filing separately, spouses are required to split the exclusion $5,000,000 per spouse. The statutory language is silent as to the treatment of married individuals filing a joint return, and additional guidance has not been issued. There is statutory authority to treat spouses as each receiving a separate $10 million exemption, and this has been assumed throughout this example. However, the IRS could take a contrary position that the legislative intent for a married couple filing a joint return is to only receive one exemption. Each taxpayer will be required to weigh these arguments in their own individual circumstances to determine which position is correct for them.
In another article we discussed the ability to multiply these exclusions utilizing a number of different planning techniques. Here we will discuss in more detail a specific planning technique that may allow taxpayers to increase the potential exemption while still retaining some access to the funds.
What is a spousal lifetime access non-grantor trust (SLANT)?
To understand a SLANT let’s first take a high look level at a spousal lifetime access trust (SLAT). A SLAT is an irrevocable trust which is set up by one spouse for the benefit of the other. The trust can be flexible but is typically set up to make distributions to the other spouse and descendants during their life, if needed. On the death of the spouse, the remainder of trust will pass to remainder beneficiaries, often the children of the couple. For federal income tax purposes a SLAT is typically a grantor trust which means the spouse who funded the trust (the grantor) is treated as the owner of the trust and the trust is a disregarded entity for federal income tax purposes. A few common reasons for grantor trust treatment are:
- The trust income may be distributed for the benefit of the grantor’s spouse without the approval of an adverse party
- The grantor, in a non-fiduciary capacity, has a power to substitute trust assets with other property of equivalent value
A SLANT is set up similar to a SLAT but with an important distinction so the trust avoids the grantor trust rules and is a taxpaying, non-grantor trust. To avoid the common grantor inclusion items above this trust will have an individual, who has a vested interest in the trust, consent to distributions and avoid language and powers in the trust agreement allowing the grantor to substitute or have a power over the assets in the trust.
How can the use of SLANTs multiply the qualified small business stock gain exclusion?
Using a SLANT, a spouse can create a trust that provides distributions, if needed, to his or her spouse while also benefiting chosen remainder beneficiaries. The limitations related to qualified small business stock gain exclusion will now be examined at the trust level to determine the greater of $10 million per-issuer or 10 times the adjusted basis limitation. For taxpayers worried about liquidity or access to funds, distributions from the trust are still available to any current beneficiary, subject to the distribution standard listed in the trust agreement. Let’s look at an example.
Spouse A and spouse B own 2,000 shares of QSBS, with an exclusion percentage of 100%. The stock has a fair market value of $100 million and a tax basis of $1 million. If they sold the shares without additional planning, their maximum exclusion is $20 million, the greater of $10 million or 10 times basis for each taxpayer. As stated previously, we have assumed for purposes of this article that spouses are considered separate taxpayers for this purpose and each receive a separate $10 million exclusion. This conclusion is not settled and each taxpayer will have to weigh the positions available in light of their individual circumstances. This results in a $39.5 million capital gain for each taxpayer or a combined $79 million capital gain.
The spouses decide to take advantage of gift planning, as they currently have much of their gift tax exemption remaining and anticipate the value of the QSBS to continue to appreciate. They want reduce their potential estate tax liability and also their income tax liability.
Spouse A executes a trust for the benefit of spouse B funding the trust with QSBS. Their child is the trustee of the trust as well as the remainder beneficiary. The trust allows the trustee to make distributions subject to standards of health, education, maintenance and support. During the life of spouse B, he or she may receive funds from their trust. Additionally, spouse A does not retain any power which will treat them as an owner of the trust for federal income tax purposes. In this scenario, the trust will have its own exclusion and be subject to the exclusion limitations independent from spouse A or spouse B.
Taking the planning a step further, spouse A and spouse B would both like to execute SLANT agreements. We have two issues to consider: the reciprocal trust doctrine and joint representation issues. For tax purposes, we will focus on the reciprocal trust doctrine. The reciprocal trust doctrine provides if the trusts are substantially alike, the trusts will be treated as if they were created by the beneficiary and, therefore, self-settled and included in the grantor/beneficiaries estate. To avoid the reciprocal trust doctrine, we can modify certain terms of one document so they are not substantially identical, create trusts at different points in time, fund trusts with different assets and use different trustees. Typically, a combination of these are used.
Back to our example, spouse A and spouse B both executed SLANT agreements. They’ve created differences in the documents so they have different distribution standards and powers over the trust. Spouse A funded their trust with 300 shares of QSBS stock and spouse B funded their trust with 200 shares of QSBS stock as well as publicly traded securities. The two gifts, in total, were unequal in value and made at different points in time. Like in our first example, the trusts have a carryover basis of $500 per share in the QSBS. At a future date, when the taxpayers and their trusts sell the QSBS, the stock has a fair market value of $50,000 per share resulting in the following capital gains:
NUMBER OF SHARES
FAIR MARKET VALUE
EXCLUSION (GREATER OF $10M OR 10X BASIS)
In this example, the QSBS exclusion is multiplied such that the taxpayers and their trusts benefit from $39.9M combined exclusion, $19.9M more than if they had done no planning.
In order for this opportunity to work the rules relating to QSBS need to be carefully analyzed for your specific fact pattern. Once the determination has been made that a qualifying gain can be excluded planning can be done to help effectively utilize this exclusion with SLANTs. Do not wait to plan, with a possibility of tax law changes on the horizon, utilizing gifting to magnify the QSBS gain exclusion may come at a higher cost in the future.
Call us at +1 213.873.1700, email us at firstname.lastname@example.org or fill out the form below and we'll contact you to discuss your specific situation.
This article was written by Andy Swanson, Rebecca Warren, Michael Reeves and originally appeared on 2021-04-15.
2020 RSM US LLP. All rights reserved.
The information contained herein is general in nature and based on authorities that are subject to change. RSM US LLP guarantees neither the accuracy nor completeness of any information and is not responsible for any errors or omissions, or for results obtained by others as a result of reliance upon such information. RSM US LLP assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any changes in tax laws or other factors that could affect information contained herein. This publication does not, and is not intended to, provide legal, tax or accounting advice, and readers should consult their tax advisors concerning the application of tax laws to their particular situations. This analysis is not tax advice and is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for purposes of avoiding tax penalties that may be imposed on any taxpayer.
RSM US Alliance provides its members with access to resources of RSM US LLP. RSM US Alliance member firms are separate and independent businesses and legal entities that are responsible for their own acts and omissions, and each is separate and independent from RSM US LLP. RSM US LLP is the U.S. member firm of RSM International, a global network of independent audit, tax, and consulting firms. Members of RSM US Alliance have access to RSM International resources through RSM US LLP but are not member firms of RSM International. Visit rsmus.com/about us for more information regarding RSM US LLP and RSM International. The RSM logo is used under license by RSM US LLP. RSM US Alliance products and services are proprietary to RSM US LLP.
Vasquez & Company LLP is a proud member of the RSM US Alliance, a premier affiliation of independent accounting and consulting firms in the United States. RSM US Alliance provides our firm with access to resources of RSM US LLP, the leading provider of audit, tax and consulting services focused on the middle market. RSM US LLP is a licensed CPA firm and the U.S. member of RSM International, a global network of independent audit, tax and consulting firms with more than 43,000 people in over 120 countries.
Our membership in RSM US Alliance has elevated our capabilities in the marketplace, helping to differentiate our firm from the competition while allowing us to maintain our independence and entrepreneurial culture. We have access to a valuable peer network of like-sized firms as well as a broad range of tools, expertise and technical resources.
For more information on how Vasquez & Company LLP can assist you, please call +1 213.873.1700.
Subscribe to receive important updates from our Insights and Resources.